|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
| Address1 | 801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW #245 |
Address2 |
|
| City | WASHINGTON |
State | DC |
Zip Code | 20004 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
|
5. Senate ID# 290252-36
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 371850002
|
||||||||
| TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2015 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
| 10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date |
|
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
| INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
| INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
|
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
|||||||||
| Signature | Digitally Signed By: Richard Bringewatt |
Date | 4/19/2015 7:39:16 PM |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code MMM
16. Specific lobbying issues
Promoted Permanent Or Long-Term Extension Of SNP Legislative Authority in conjunction with related SNP-related provisions contained in H.R. 2.
Advocated for creating a legislative pathway for the integration of Medicare and Medicaid for persons dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Provisions are important for enabling Special Needs Plans and Medicaire-Medicaid Plans to improve efficiencies in program administration and to establish improved benefits and care methods for serving frail elders, adults with disabilities, and other persons with complex medical conditions, such as HIV-AIDS, ESRD, and SMPM. These are the most costly and complex care subgroups of the dually eligible population.
Advocated for changes in methods used to measure SNP performance under Stars to more effectively address factors, often referred to as social determinants of health, that influence health and health outcomes for dually eligible beneficiaries beyond what exists for persons of higher income, education, and social economic status. Current provisions do not take these factors into account and penalize plans that seek to specialize in care of poor, frail, disabled, chronically ill persons.
Advocated For Appropriate Medicare Risk Adjusted Payment Methods For SNPs Serving High Risk Populations, Including Reducing The Disparities Between Medicare Advantage Payments For Beneficiaries Who Are Dually Eligible For Medicare And Medicaid, And Medicaid and For Non-Duals, Evaluating And Advocating For Adjustments To Account For Unfunded Costs Associated With Social Determinants Of Health, Ensuring That SNPs Are Not Paid Less Than Fee-For-Service For Beneficiaries Eligible For Medicare And Medicaid Services, And Other Matters;
Worked Toward Advancing More Appropriate Basis For The Evaluation And Approval Of Special Needs Plans, Including Aligning Model Of Care Requirements And Structure And Process Measures; Modifying The Star Rating Measures To Be More Relevant To Populations Served By Special Needs Plans;
And Risk Adjusting Or Stratifying Measures To Account For The Impact Of Socioeconomic Status On Ratings For Plans Serving Disadvantaged Populations Like Dual Eligible Enrollees;
Conducted Executive Roundtable on March 30-31 regarding an array of Special Needs Plan and Medicare-Medicaid Plan issues. Selected Congressional staff and staff from CMS participated in selected sessions as presenters or members of a discussant panel.
Worked With The Medicare/Medicaid Coordination Office, Congress, And Others Towards Advancing The Integration Of Medicare And Medicaid Benefits For Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees;
Advocated Against The Termination Of Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans On The Basis Of Low Performing Icons; Requested That CMS Delay The Decision To Act On Termination And To Modify The Time frame During Which Plans Would Be Evaluated For Performance In Relation To Termination; And Worked Wit Congress Is Support Of This Objective.
Advocated For An Evaluation Of The Reliability Of Data From Self-Report Survey Instruments When Completed By Persons With Cognitive Impairment Or Mental Illness When Data Are Used For Public Reporting As Part Of The Public Comments On Updates To The Health Outcome Survey.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Rich |
Bringewatt |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
| Address |
|
||||||
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
| 1 |
|
3 |
|
||||||
| 2 |
|
4 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
| Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
| Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% | |||||||||||||
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
| 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 |